This month, the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB), the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), the Association of Online Publishers and ISBA (Incorporated Society of British Advertisers) have announced a joint venture to create a BARB* style audience measurement panel for the Internet in the UK. The panel will be managed through JICIMS, the Joint Industry Committee for Internet Measurement Systems.
The advent of this panel could herald a major stepping stone in online’s journey to full maturity as an advertising medium. But equally, the creation of such a panel creates a Premier League of online media owners. What does this mean for those online media owners who don’t make it into the top flight?
It’s great to be in the BARB Club
In the TV world, being on the BARB panel puts your channel firmly on the radar of media planners. When measured by BARB, your channel is part of a Premier League of measured media options. These are the channels which have high critical mass; they have enough audience to value being measured and enough cash to pay for being measured. Planners use presence on BARB as a proxy for quality. Because all channels on BARB are measured in the same way, using the same currency, planners can make a fair assessment of media value when evaluating a range of channels. So, if you’re on BARB it is far easier to command the attention of media planners and therefore much easier to get your site included in the planner’s media recommendation.
But not so good if you’re on the outside
Unfortunately the average media planner is short on time. If he or she can solve a communications planning problem from within a pre-selected group of measurable channels, then they will. Why should they extend their attention beyond 200 or so BARB measured channels? Channels outside BARB tend to be small (they don’t think being on BARB will help them because their audiences are so small) or cash strapped (not able to afford to £25k+ fee required to be included on BARB). For many time-starved media planners, these marginals simply aren’t worth the bother.
What does a BARB style panel mean for online?
It’s obvious from the experiences of the TV market that panel members will become part of an elite group of media owners - the Premier League of online. This select group of media owners will inevitably form the start point for many online media planners and they will find it easier to be included in media recommendations. Those sites not on the panel will struggle to be included on plans and consequently struggle to gain revenue.
To cut a long story short, life without an online measurement panel makes it easier for smaller sites to survive. With the online panel in place that emphasis is likely to shift; making it easier for larger sites to gain revenue and build reputation, and push smaller sites onto the outside margins of planners’ attention. So, rather ironically, the desire to make online a more measurable medium could favour the few and disadvantage the many.
* For those not familiar with BARB, the BARB panel is a panel of 5,000 homes in the UK which uses a ‘Peoplemeter’ device to track the TV viewing patterns of occupants of the sample household.








Follow us on Twitter


Press ad revenue will fall by £1.6bn - at least
WARC and the Advertising Association have predicted that UK press advertising spend could fall by £1.6 billion by 2019. This recent forecast is at least realistic and possibly an over optimistic scenario for press. At the Newspaper Society Conference in 2000 I identified a stratum of media communication that was dangerously exposed to competition from the Internet. It’s that layer of product and service based advertising - where to go, where to find it, how to do it - often locally. In short, it was press “small ads”; fractionals, classified ads and directory entries. These areas of press are under attack from three sides:
1. Consumers aren’t using press for news in the way they used to
2. Consumers are finding product information in online search when they need it, not in fractional press ads when media planners think they need it
3. As a consequence of item 2, advertisers are finding far greater product sales efficiencies in areas like online search. Some advertisers are spending £500k per month in search - and that is most likely from the very product sales budget that would have gone to fractional and small ads in press and directories.
I thought I’d add some media forecasts of my own for 2019:
1. The media world will look as different in 2019 as a motorway now looks when compared to a dirt track.
2. Many magazines and newspapers will have gone completely, the established brands will continue to exist online with lower circulation ‘feature and comment’ magazines in print.
3. Most TV will be delivered via Broadband Internet.
4. Viewers will schedule all their own entertainment on an on demand basis; the job of TV scheduler will cease to exist.
5. The boundaries between print and TV will fuse with much cross-media consumption and ownership
6. Consumers will organise their own news and TV programme schedules in a framework that looks like today’s RSS readers.
7. The provider of the new “universal reader” will probably be the new Google but they are unlikely to develop this “universal reader” as most companies only have one huge hit and they’ve had theirs.
8. The use of personal devices like ipods will become all pervasive; and they’ll do far more; you’ll be able to turn your oven on with it.
9. The decline in press ad revenue will be greater than £1.9bn by 2019.